Aims and Scope

Author Guidelines
Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

Article Processing Charges (APC) / Publication Fees

JRIAR is an open-access journal. We do not charge any fee for manuscript submission or peer review.
Upon acceptance of the paper after double-blind peer review, the following publication charges apply:

| Single Author / Indian Authors | ₹1,000 INR |
| Multiple Authors (Up to 3) | ₹1,500 INR |
| International Authors | $50 USD |
| Fast Track Review & Publication | ₹2,500 INR |

*The publication charges cover website hosting, indexing, DOI assignment, and digital certificate generation.*

Submission Preparation Checklist
All submissions must meet the following requirements.

This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

Open Access Policy

Peer Review Process

• 1. Initial Assessment

  The Editorial Office checks the manuscript for formatting, scope, and plagiarism.

• 2. Editor Assignment

  An appropriate Editor handles the manuscript and assigns at least two independent expert reviewers.

• 3. Peer Review

  Reviewers evaluate the scientific quality and provide feedback (Double-blind process).

• 4. Final Decision

  The Editor makes a decision based on reviewer recommendations (Accept, Revise, or Reject).